«
»

Should we continue supporting old Windows versions?

At some point, the following question asks itself. We’d like to know your opinion. And if you vote no, we’d like to know why.

Is it OK to drop support for Windows previous to Windows 2000?

  • Yes, but keep fixing bugs for a while (26%, 24 Votes)
  • No, I love my Windows 98! (26%, 24 Votes)
  • I don't care (20%, 19 Votes)
  • Yes, and also drop ANSI versions (18%, 17 Votes)
  • Yes, but keep distributing both ANSI and UNICODE versions (10%, 10 Votes)

Total Voters: 94

Loading ... Loading ...

This entry was posted on Tuesday, July 1st, 2008 at 6:45 pm and is filed under Poll. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

5 Responses to “Should we continue supporting old Windows versions?”

  1. Startup Manager News » Edit offline user’s startup items Says:
    July 1st, 2008 at 6:50 pm

    [...] Should we continue supporting old Windows versions? [...]

  2. Chris van den Kieboom Says:
    July 3rd, 2008 at 6:27 pm

    Maybe make 2 packages for Startupmanager? The Pre-Win2x version and the Post-Win2x version

  3. Richard Says:
    July 3rd, 2008 at 7:31 pm

    I’m with Chris van den Kieboom, so much of what MS has been releasing of late has been crap, and so many of my clients are still running pre W2K machines that it does seem useful to continue.

  4. Glenn Says:
    July 19th, 2008 at 11:03 am

    Since the “Yes, but keep fixing bugs for a while” answer has the most votes so far, I’ll consider your idea. It is probably the best solution, but it also is a lot of work to maintain two different packages.

  5. rrapoza Says:
    September 7th, 2008 at 12:41 am

    IT IS A FREE APP,
    KEEP IT FREE FOR ALL.